Debate continues to rage as to whether the massive growth of social media is killing off the public relations industry.
The contrary view, of course, is that social media is a fillip for the industry. Let's face it, with so many media channels now available, companies and brands need more help than ever with their communications and one could argue quite persuasively that PR is the most suitable discipline to provide the most effective guidance and counsel.
American PR company Horn Group recently hosted a forum to discuss this very issue under the handle Is Social Media Killing PR? (see video below by Kara Swisher from Allthingsd.com).
The forum was partly in response to a series of posts by several heavyweight US bloggers who, let's just say, are not massive fans of the PR industry.
Check out Horn Group's blog for further reaction to the night.
Prominent industry analyst Jeremiah Owyang also weighed into the argument.
According to the Horn Group: "We originally conceived it as a sort of smackdown in which we get at the tensions between PR, media and bloggers, but we knew that'd be over-simplistic and limited."
Does social media make PR irrelevant? the agency asked.
In what is a pretty sad indictment for Australia, this issue barely makes any ripples (let alone waves) within local PR circles, but overseas it continues to simmer as the blogosphere and public relations industry trade (written) blows.
It's interesting to watch these exchanges unfold from across the other side of the pond. My thoughts for what they're worth:
Firstly, the high profile trio of blogger antagonists -
Robert Scoble,
Michael Arrington and
Jason Calacanis - focus on the (somewhat inward-looking) technology industry, so their comments certainly need to be put into some context.
Secondly, it appears commentary surrounding this issue tends to concentrate pretty much on media relations and not PR in a broader sense. In other words, PR people pitching journalists and bloggers, and how many of them dislike/loathe it. Now, while media relations is an important part of the PR discipline, it is still just that - a part.
Many public relations professionals provide strategic communications counsel and utilise a broad array of tactics to get their message out in to the marketplace and drum up word of mouth. To think that public relations people spend all their time pitching journos (and now, it seems, bloggers) is a little out-dated. That said, I acknowledge some PR agencies do have a strong bias towards media relations, and today this would potentially include the blogosphere.
Scoble, Arrington, Calacanis and their anti-PR brethren are undoubtedly correct when they claim many PR people waste the time of bloggers and journalists because they continue to spew out ill-directed and unappealing press releases ad nauseam...that they don't understand what makes news...that they are more hindrance than value-add...that they simply DO-NOT-LISTEN.
This is an old argument and it's not going to go away...unfortunately. Like any profession, PR has got more than its fair share of 'bad eggs', but to tar the entire global industry with the same brush, well, me thinks that's a tad naive.
Back to the issue of social media and PR - I for one would love more debate about it in Australia.
My view is social media is an absolute bonus for marketing and corporate communicators.
Will social media kill the industry?
Nah! Companies will always need to get their message out into the marketplace and PR is well placed to help them do that.
Will social media put PR agencies out of business?
I haven't got a cut-and-dried answer to that question, other than "I doubt it". My view is the agencies (and in-house departments) that wholeheartedly embrace social media will emerge all the stronger for it. If they're already on the way to understanding that social media is having a profound effect on the future of PR and communications, this would certainly put them ahead of the game. The challenge is to stay there!
The 'kicker' I guess is whether agencies simply jump on the social media bandwagon in a bid to make themselves look good (and maybe snag some extra business) - or are they truly passionate about blogs, podcasts, RSS, online video and social networking and the collective power and influence these tools can have for their clients.
Hat tip to Mitch Baldwin who was the starting point for this post. I'm tipping we haven't heard an end to the argument!
Recent Comments