I've always admired Jamie Oliver's non-pretentious and humble attitude. His fresh and authentic demeanor has without doubt played a key role in his ongoing success achieved across a number of mediums.
On the other hand, you have the public relations industry which, one could argue, has elements that are the antithesis of Oliver - i.e. pretentious, boastful, insincere.
I'm not lumping the entire PR industry into this camp - far from it - but unfortunately there are those (a minority) who knowingly or unwittingly continue to give the profession a bad name.
Having worked in PR for 20 years, I understand totally that a core part of our business involves the development and delivery of key messages. Nothing wrong with that at all. Communicating with clarity is important for companies and organisations. And there's nothing wrong with persuasively putting your side of an argument, whether via the media, a blog, podcast or at a live event. These are staples of the public relations discipline.
'POSITIVE SPIN'
However, where it starts getting murky is when people start 'spinning' the truth - twisting words every which way in a deliberate attempt to distort the real situation.
It's a practice that can start so innocently, such as putting a 'positive spin' on a particular story, and this is understandable. Everyone wants to be seen in a positive light. Generally speaking, I think you'll find such a practice is by and large pretty harmless...simply a case of human nature. People doing what people do.
But then you get those who take 'positive spin' three steps further, and into the realm of 'black art'.
We all know that politicians are the worst purveyors of spin; they're advised by armies of strategists and media consultants who, in the eyes of the general public, embody what PR is all about.
And don't forget the corporate spinmeisters. There are a few of them around too who are not averse to perpetrating the odd distortion of the truth.
But, to be fair, let's not lay the blame solely at the feet of media advisers and corporate affairs personnel. After all, they're human - they work in high pressure jobs and they have to appease their bosses. I think you'll find that generally, it's the politicians and CEOs who set the scene. If a 'straight shooter' CEO wanted nothing to do with spin, then there's every chance his or her communications adviser would play ball and act accordingly.
The media too are not immune to blame as they put their own spin on stories. Their agenda often is to sensationalise - to sell more papers, attract more listeners, viewers etc. In reality, are editors and broadcast producers really any different to the sinister faceless spinmeisters they continually rail against? I'm generalising obviously, but this is a trend that's not going away, and it has serious implications for the public relations profession.
To me, true PR professionals are less about 'spin' and more about engendering two-way relationships with the people who matter to your business or organisation. It doesn't make sense to try and 'pull the wool' over people's eyes - how is that going to help your cause?
Which brings me back to Jamie Oliver.
In an article in The Guardian, Patrick Butler writes that Jamie Oliver's fashionable Fifteen restaurant has struggled to meet its ambitious social objectives.
Distracted by the demands of TV cameras and keeping the (unexpectedly successful) restaurant going, Fifteen's support, training and counselling services for its vulnerable trainees were under-resourced, erratic, and powered by a misplaced belief in the power of righteous enthusiasm.
The source of this information was a report conducted into the Fifteen operation.
But perhaps the most remarkable thing about the report, according to Butler, is that the report was commissioned and published by Fifteen itself. In the foreword, its (recently departed) director, Liam Black, writes: "This is not a typical annual report or PR document, it is a warts-and-all look into the guts of Fifteen, celebrating what's great about this place but acknowledging too when and how we have missed the mark."
Writes Butler: "With a generous and committed backer such as Oliver, perhaps Fifteen can afford to be virtuously candid about its shortcomings. But the report suggests that success for any social business involves being truthful about, and learning from, mistakes - and that listening to clients (in this case, the trainees) pays dividends. There is also a refreshing assumption that the public (and investors, donors and voters) will trust you more if you eschew glossy spin in favour of candour about your performance in running a complex and difficult business."
This last sentence deserves repeating.
There is also a refreshing assumption that the public (and investors, donors and voters) will trust you more if you eschew glossy spin in favour of candour about your performance in running a complex and difficult business.
This, my friends, is what true PR is all about.
Recent Comments